The General Demolition Of My Opinions

I was watching the French presidential elections and it got me thinking why was there something instead of nothing in the universe. I mean, we wouldn't have to sit through all the sound and fury of life if there was nothing. Things would be so much simpler as there would be, um, no things. No matter, no energy, no space, no time. Imagine, with so little to do in a quantum void we could all have a lie in on a Saturday morning. I admit that absolute nothing as a state is hard to conceive. It puts things in perspective, although you can't actually put things in perspective in a nothing as there aren't any planes of reference... ho, ho. The thing with something is that you can compare it to something, but you can't compare nothing to nothing. Nothing is hard to grab. And, furthermore, nothing is unstable. If we go back to the beginning, the Big Bang theory states that something came out of nothing because this latter was unstable. So we exist in a something because it is more stable, which, looking around, certainly doesn't seem the case. Some will say, 'what about God in all this?' For me, an equally pressing question is if the universe -our something- is so vast and ever expanding then how come the constant lack of leg room? As far as a something goes, it's not a great something. However, if I had to vote between nothing and something, I guess I would vote something. Which brings me neatly back to the French presidential elections.